Back to News

Idaho fights against court order to destroy elk and wolf data


Idaho Elk
Photo credt: Shutterstock

In January, U.S. District Court Judge B. Lynn Winmill ruled that the data Idaho collected on elk and wolves within the Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness was illegal due to the way it was collected. Biologists used a helicopter to locate and collar the animals; however, within this wilderness area, the use of any aircraft is strictly prohibited. This week, Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)Director Virgil Moore asked for “a stay of the judgment” while IDFG waits for their appeal of the ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, The Register-Guard reports.

As goHUNT previously reported, Winmill noted the unique nature of the case and determined that the only way to resolve the matter was to issue an order to destroy the data collected. While the U.S. Forest Service(USFS) initiated the directive to collar the elk, the agency neglected to open that decision to a public comment period, which would have possibly prevented the intrusion into the Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness. Regardless, while IDFG biologists worked to collar 60 elk, they also collared four wolves, which they say was a “miscommunication with a helicopter crew” as the original plan didn’t authorize that action.

Gear Shop - Shop Now

Animal activist groups do not support extending management of wolves to wilderness areas like this one as they believe it provides a sanctuary for young wolves to establish territory and live in the wild despite the impact wolves may have on the state’s elk population. Western Watersheds Project, Friends of the Clearwater and Wilderness Watch sued the USFS once they learned of the wilderness violation for GPS tracking purposes, which resulted in Winmill’s decision that the data should be destroyed. In the final ruling, Winmill found the USFS in violation of the National Environmental Protection Act and the Wilderness Act of 1964.

For now, the decision as to whether the stay will be approved is still pending and IDFG does not comment on current litigation.


Log in or register to post comments.

Todd B. - posted 1 year ago on 12-19-2017 11:40:23 am

I met a guy in FCW this past November that said he has eliminated two whole packs himself with legal tags. Wahoooo and may his tribe increase. We saw elk there this year. Looking forward to good days ahead.

James H. - posted 1 year ago on 12-14-2017 08:11:56 am
Mount Vernon, Wa

No matter what your stance on wolves may be, this is another brilliant example of emotion over riding logic and science. Spear headed by what Steven Rinella would describe as the "New Jersey Cat Ladies". I cant believe that the legal remedy in this situation would be to destroy useful data once it is already gathered. Wow

Josey S. - posted 1 year ago on 12-12-2017 07:48:54 am

Watch the documentary "Crying Wolf" from a few Montana college students. You will know why they want the wolf data and info destroyed.

Mark M. - posted 1 year ago on 12-11-2017 04:46:19 pm

And the world has to bow to the damn wolves,

Brian A. - posted 1 year ago on 12-11-2017 03:56:01 pm
Bozeman, MT

David B's comments were exactly what I was thinking...what a waste of $$

David B. - posted 1 year ago on 12-08-2017 02:55:08 pm

Regardless of how the data was collected, tax payer dollars were used to collect it. To destroy good data seems like a waste...

Gary H. - posted 1 year ago on 12-08-2017 09:59:39 am

Its hard to believe that there is such a rise in tag prices nationwide.