Back to News

Idaho farmer payout for elk damage exceeds $1 million

Farmer claims 1 million in elk damage

Photo credit: Shutterstock

It’s not unusual for farmers to claim wildlife crop damage, especially when their agricultural fields are close to deer and elk herds. However, an Idaho farmer’s recent claim for elk damage exceeded $1 million. Don McFarland filed for $1.028 million in damages due to 500 elk eating his organic Kamut wheat and organic potato crops, “compacting the soil in the process,” at his Little Camas Ranch farm in Elmore County, Idaho, the Post Register reports. The payout, which the state honored, drained the Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s (IDFG) Expendable Big Game Depredation Trust Account that compensates farmers for wildlife depredation, resulting in a proposed new “payment cap” so that doesn’t happen again.

During the last legislative session, Sen. Bert Brackett (R-Twin Falls) introduced SB1151, which would keep depredation compensation funds from being used by a single claim. According to the Post Register, SB1151 would “place a cap on the amount paid on any single depredation claim to not exceed 10% of the annual appropriation for the big game depredation account.” While Brackett called McFarland’s claim an “outlier,” SB1151 means that farmers who have excessive damage due to elk, deer or other big game animals would only receive $110,000, which is the cap proposed for the annual appropriation of $1.1 million in the depredation account.

Shop article bar

Since the fund was established in 1990, claims have increased. According to the Post Register, in 2016, there were 32 claims (resulting in a total of $359,100.01 in payouts) and, in 2018, 59 claims filed (totaling $754,833.83 in payouts).

“I think the reality is that there are more elk in the ag interface than there were 10 years ago,” said Toby Boudreau, IDFG wildlife bureau chief. “Our dairy industry in Southern Idaho has been growing by leaps and bounds over the past decade, and their need for corn has grown with it.”

And, according to IDFG regional wildlife manager Mike McDonald, a lot of the farmland affected “lies at the heart of a migration corridor for elk and deer” like McFarland’s organic potato and wheat operation.

“You have this fantastic piece of property that’s located in a really cool area that has lots of ‘groceries’ and has lots of elk,” said McDonald.

While hazing methods and fencing were initially used to keep hungry elk and deer from these agricultural areas, IDFG discovered that sage grouse had difficulty navigating fences. This means that the next management method will be lethal. According to McDonald, this summer and fall, the agency “will aim to be more strategic in deploying lethal measures” in an effort to “cut back on depredation and reduce monetary claims.”


Log in or register to post comments.

guy b. - posted 21 hours ago on 08-20-2019 09:50:47 am

This is what happens when farmers do not let hunter's manage these elk by not letting tag holders hunt Elk on their land. Then go crying to F&G for hand out's!!! If they complain then fish and game step in and manage hunt's on there land way cheaper than paying out 1.1 mil. Fish & Game are already getting paid.

Eddie T. - posted 2 months ago on 06-10-2019 06:13:51 pm

What I meant to say was is that I PRAY the ELK get better Treatment Than ALL NATIVES before

Eddie T. - posted 2 months ago on 06-10-2019 06:07:44 pm

I'm Part CHEROKEE the ELK and most other animals were here before fencing came you encrosh in their land these things happen so don't blame the ELK because you buy land in the middle of the main migration path.. that would be like blaming my PEOPLE for being here first..I PRAY they do the ELK like NATIVES before their...

Coby B. - posted 2 months ago on 06-01-2019 06:17:26 pm

I’m sure this why there has been increased tag numbers around agriculture land throughout southern Idaho. Once again reactive instead of proactive. Article even stated increased crop damage in prior years... nothing done till it drains the financials.. pathetic.

Coby B. - posted 2 months ago on 06-01-2019 06:07:34 pm

Seems like high fence in affected areas would pay dividends to IDFG long term... , but state agencies can only be reactive... reactive is name of the game when it comes to managing wildlife throughout the west. Can we please take a proactive stance for hell sake!!!

james k. - posted 2 months ago on 05-31-2019 05:45:42 pm

Where is this guys property? I'm putting in for tags there!!

Allen D. - posted 2 months ago on 05-31-2019 02:19:10 pm

Private property owners have to put up fences to keep ranchers cattle out farmer's should have to put up high fences to keep our elk out.

dillon d. - posted 2 months ago on 05-30-2019 10:16:46 pm

Did the landowner allow hunting or any "lethal" measures by IDFG before he submitted the claim? If not, his claim should have been denied.