Menu
Back to News

Former Colorado wildlife commissioner says reintroducing wolves is a bad idea

Former Colorado wildlife commissioner says reintroducing wolves is a bad idea

Photo credit: Dreamstime

Is the push to reintroduce wolves in Colorado a good idea? Former state wildlife commissioner Rick Enstrom says definitely not. Enstrom, who served as Colorado State Wildlife Commissioner from 2000 to 2008 and chairman for three years, is considered “an expert on wolves in Colorado.” He went on the record with Complete Colorado last week, warning against the reintroduction measure—and not only because of the risk of increased predation on livestock, big game and pets.

There’s also the financial side to consider. As the current initiative is worded, if passed, it would require wolf management and predation compensation paid via the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) wildlife cash fund “to the extent that they are available,” according to Complete Colorado. That fund pays for all of CPW’s wildlife operations. Hunting and fishing license sales are the primary source of those funds and, according to Enstrom, “it’s always over-budgeted.” Further, based upon the state’s fiscal impact statement, the wolf reintroduction program would cost about $800,000 just to get it going.

“There are two issues,” said Enstrom. “One is the effect on the people in the pickup trucks doing the Lord’s work for the Forest Service and Colorado Parks and Wildlife, who are in short supply on both sides. The other big problem is that the funding structure is predicated on the sale of big game licenses.”

Gear Shop bar

“That’s the money we [use to] manage everything, from greenback trout to Prebles meadow jumping mice to stocking trout, to the establishment of state wildlife areas and their management,” continued Enstrom. “Any time you do anything to a budget they just start taking it out of other budgets because there is no extra money.”

Coupled with the financial burden is the fact that CPW staff would also need to shoulder additional responsibilities associated with the reintroduction program that could take away from regular duties.

And, according to Enstrom, the state’s deer and elk populations don’t deserve the hit that happen if wolves are back in the state.

“Sixty-four of the wildlife districts have numbers of deer and elk that are under the amount that the habitat can properly support,” Enstrom said. “We don’t have a healthy elk population. We’re in an ebb right now.”

As goHUNT previously reported, the Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund has collected enough valid signatures to place an initiative to reintroduce wolves to the Centennial State on the 2020 ballot. According to Complete Colorado, a total of 211,093 petition signatures were submitted in December and, while signature verification is still ongoing, only 124,632 valid signatures are required to force the initiative on the ballot. 

Stay tuned to goHUNT for more information.

5 Comments

Log in or register to post comments.

matthew h. - posted 2 weeks ago on 03-13-2020 04:40:11 pm

My vote will be NO this coming November. I already have to worry about cougar and bear. I don't need another predator to worry about while hiking or camping in the mountains with my small children. Also what about all those people who like to hike with dogs off leash, that would not be possible without some danger of attack. I think people forget how huge they are: https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-434eca1946dee202466b2bc1bd40c551-c

matthew a. - posted 2 months ago on 01-08-2020 06:46:06 am
Sheridan, WY
goHUNT INSIDER

Arron,

There is validity in your statement. I don't think its quite as black and white as all wolf supporters hate hunting though.

The target audiance that I see a NR Petition influencing, would be the broader non-hunting populace of the state. Force financially liability to State residents. In addition, the smaller communities that rely heavily upon increased NR Hunter sales in the fall; would force Denver / Boulder to pick up the Tab.

Bottom line: increase cost for the wolf introduction to all the people who think they are indifferent. That huge middle of the road demographic is who will decide if this happens or not.

Arron J. - posted 2 months ago on 01-07-2020 09:31:23 pm
goHUNT INSIDER

@matthew a, what you're proposing is precisely what the folks pushing introducing a non-native invasive wolf species into Colorado want. They hate hunting, but ironically find it spiritual when Canadian wolves chow down on every fury object in sight. If NRs stop hunting in CO, the wackos win. Sad after the decades and billions hunters and fisherman have poured into conservation. The cheapest option is probably to hand them all one of those retro wolf howling at the moon t-shirts. Walmart probably still has a bunch in a warehouse somewhere.

matthew a. - posted 2 months ago on 01-06-2020 05:10:06 pm
Sheridan, WY
goHUNT INSIDER

I would like to start a petition to boycott hunting, fishing, and recreation activities in Colorado. If all the Non Resident outdoorsmen and women signed a petition vowing never to return if wolves are introduced, the financial implications imposed would over shadow the wolf initiative.

Thoughts?

Travis G. - posted 2 months ago on 01-06-2020 12:49:44 pm
goHUNT INSIDER

this is just bad all around